CertC++-INT35ΒΆ
Use correct integer precisions
Required inputs: IR
Integer types in C have both a size and a precision. The size
indicates the number of bytes used by an object and can be retrieved for any
object or type using the
sizeof operator. The precision of an integer type is the
number of bits it uses to represent values, excluding any sign and padding
bits.
Padding bits contribute to the integer's size, but not to its precision.
Consequently, inferring the precision of an integer type from its size may
result in too large a value, which can then lead to incorrect assumptions about
the numeric range of these types. Programmers should use correct integer
precisions in their code, and in particular, should not use the
sizeof operator to compute the precision of an integer type on
architectures that use padding bits or in strictly conforming (that is,
portable) programs.
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code
example illustrates a function that produces 2 raised to the power of the
function argument. To prevent undefined behavior in compliance with
INT34-C.
Do not shift an expression by a negative number of bits or by greater than or
equal to the number of bits that exist in the operand, the function ensures
that the argument is less than the number of bits used to store a value of type
unsigned int.
#include <limits.h>
unsigned int pow2(unsigned int exp) {
if (exp >= sizeof(unsigned int) * CHAR_BIT) {
/* Handle error */
}
return 1 << exp;
}
However, if this code runs on a platform where
unsigned int has one or more padding bits, it can still result in
values for
exp that are too large. For example, on a platform that stores
unsigned int in 64 bits, but uses only 48 bits to represent the
value, a left shift of 56 bits would result in undefined behavior.
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution uses a
popcount() function, which counts the number of bits set on any
unsigned integer, allowing this code to determine the precision of any integer
type, signed or unsigned.
#include <stddef.h>
#include <stdint.h>
/* Returns the number of set bits */
size_t popcount(uintmax_t num) {
size_t precision = 0;
while (num != 0) {
if (num % 2 == 1) {
precision++;
}
num >>= 1;
}
return precision;
}
#define PRECISION(umax_value) popcount(umax_value)
Implementations can replace the
PRECISION() macro with a type-generic macro that returns an
integer constant expression that is the precision of the specified type for
that implementation. This return value can then be used anywhere an integer
constant expression can be used, such as in a static assertion. (See
DCL03-C.
Use a static assertion to test the value of a constant expression.) The
following type generic macro, for example, might be used for a specific
implementation targeting the IA-32 architecture:
#define PRECISION(value) _Generic(value, \ unsigned char : 8, \ unsigned short: 16, \ unsigned int : 32, \ unsigned long : 32, \ unsigned long long : 64, \ signed char : 7, \ signed short : 15, \ signed int : 31, \ signed long : 31, \ signed long long : 63)
The revised version of the
pow2() function uses the
PRECISION() macro to determine the precision of the unsigned type:
#include <stddef.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <limits.h>
extern size_t popcount(uintmax_t);
#define PRECISION(umax_value) popcount(umax_value)
unsigned int pow2(unsigned int exp) {
if (exp >= PRECISION(UINT_MAX)) {
/* Handle error */
}
return 1 << exp;
}
Implementation Details
Some platforms, such as the Cray Linux Environment (CLE; supported on Cray XT
CNL compute nodes), provide
a _popcnt instruction that can substitute for the
popcount() function.
#define PRECISION(umax_value) _popcnt(umax_value)
Risk Assessment
Mistaking an integer's size for its precision can permit invalid precision arguments to operations such as bitwise shifts, resulting in undefined behavior.
| Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INT35-C | Low | Unlikely | Medium | P2 | L3 |
Related Guidelines
| Taxonomy | Taxonomy item | Relationship |
|---|---|---|
| CWE 2.11 | CWE-681, Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types |
2017-10-30:MITRE:Unspecified Relationship 2018-10-18:CERT:Partial
Overlap |
Bibliography
| [ Dowd 2006] | Chapter 6, "C Language Issues" |
| [ C99 Rationale 2003] | 6.5.7, "Bitwise Shift Operators" |
Possible Messages
Key |
Text |
Severity |
Disabled |
|---|---|---|---|
shift_with_sizeof_guard |
Right operand of shift operator is wrongly guarded using sizeof |
None |
False |
Options
This rule shares the following common options: exclude_in_macros, exclude_messages_in_system_headers, excludes, extend_exclude_to_macro_invocations, includes, justification_checker, languages, post_processing, provider, report_at, severity
The following places define options that affect this rule: Stylechecks, Analysis-GlobalOptions
This rule has no individual options.