CertC-PRE02ΒΆ
Macro replacement lists should be parenthesized
Required inputs: IR
Macro replacement lists should be parenthesized to protect any lower-precedence operators from the surrounding expression. See also PRE00-C. Prefer inline or static functions to function-like macros and PRE01-C. Use parentheses within macros around parameter names.
Noncompliant Code Example
This
CUBE() macro definition is noncompliant because it fails to
parenthesize the replacement list:
#define CUBE(X) (X) * (X) * (X) int i = 3; int a = 81 / CUBE(i);
As a result, the invocation
int a = 81 / CUBE(i);
expands to
int a = 81 / i * i * i;
which evaluates as
int a = ((81 / i) * i) * i); /* Evaluates to 243 */
which is not the desired behavior.
Compliant Solution
With its replacement list parenthesized, the
CUBE() macro expands correctly for this type of invocation.
#define CUBE(X) ((X) * (X) * (X)) int i = 3; int a = 81 / CUBE(i);
This compliant solution violates PRE00-C. Prefer inline or static functions to function-like macros. Consequently, this solution would be better implemented as an inline function.
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example,
END_OF_FILE is defined as
-1. The macro replacement list consists of a unary negation
operator followed by an integer literal 1:
#define END_OF_FILE -1
/* ... */
if (getchar() END_OF_FILE) {
/* ... */
}
In this example, the programmer has mistakenly omitted the comparison operator
from the conditional statement, which should be
getchar() != END_OF_FILE. (See
void
MSC02-C. Avoid errors of omission.) After macro expansion, the conditional
expression is incorrectly evaluated as a binary operation:
getchar()-1. This statement is syntactically correct, even though
it is certainly not what the programmer intended. Note that this example also
violates
DCL00-C.
Const-qualify immutable objects.
Parenthesizing the
-1 in the declaration of
END_OF_FILE ensures that the macro expansion is evaluated
correctly:
#define END_OF_FILE (-1)
Once this modification is made, the noncompliant code example no longer
compiles because the macro expansion results in the conditional expression
getchar() (-1), which is no longer syntactically valid. Note that
there must be a space after
END_OF_FILE because, otherwise, it becomes a
function-like
macro (and one that is incorrectly formed because -1 cannot be a formal
parameter).
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, the macro definition is replaced with an
enumeration constant in compliance with
DCL00-C.
Const-qualify immutable objects. In addition, because
EOF is a reserved macro defined in the
<stdio.h> header, the compliant solution must also use a
different indentifier in order to comply with
DCL37-C.
Do not declare or define a reserved identifier.
enum { END_OF_FILE = -1 };
/* ... */
if (getchar() != END_OF_FILE) {
/* ... */
}
Exceptions
PRE02-C-EX1: A macro that expands to a single identifier or function call is not affected by the precedence of any operators in the surrounding expression, so its replacement list need not be parenthesized.
#define MY_PID getpid()
PRE02-C-EX2: A macro that expands to an array reference using
the array-subscript operator
[], or an expression designating a member of a structure or union
object using either the member-access
. or
-> operators is not affected by the precedence of any
operators in the surrounding expression, so its replacement list need not be
parenthesized.
#define NEXT_FREE block->next_free #define CID customer_record.account.cid #define TOOFAR array[MAX_ARRAY_SIZE]
Risk Assessment
Failing to parenthesize macro replacement lists can cause unexpected results.
| Recommendation | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRE02-C | Medium | Probable | Low | P12 | L1 |
Related Guidelines
| SEI CERT C++ Coding Standard | VOID PRE02-CPP. Macro replacement lists should be parenthesized |
| ISO/IEC TR 24772:2013 | Operator Precedence/Order of Evaluation [JCW] Pre-processor Directives [NMP] |
Bibliography
| [ Plum 1985] | Rule 1-1 |
| [ Summit 2005] | Question 10.1 |
Possible Messages
Key |
Text |
Severity |
Disabled |
|---|---|---|---|
unsafe_macro_body |
Macro replacement text potentially must be parenthesized. |
None |
False |
Options
This rule shares the following common options: exclude_in_macros, exclude_messages_in_system_headers, excludes, extend_exclude_to_macro_invocations, includes, justification_checker, languages, post_processing, provider, report_at, severity
The following places define options that affect this rule: Stylechecks, Analysis-GlobalOptions
This rule has no individual options.