CertC-CON36¶
Wrap functions that can spuriously wake up in a loop
Required inputs: IR
The
cnd_wait() and
cnd_timedwait() functions temporarily cede possession
of a mutex so that other threads that may be requesting the mutex can proceed.
These functions must always be called from code that is protected by
locking a mutex. The waiting thread resumes execution only after it has been
notified, generally as the result of the invocation of the
cnd_signal() or
cnd_broadcast() function invoked by another thread. The
cnd_wait() function must be invoked from a loop that checks
whether a
condition
predicate holds. A condition predicate is an expression constructed
from the variables of a function that must be true for a thread to be allowed
to continue execution. The thread pauses execution, via
cnd_wait(),
cnd_timedwait(), or some other mechanism, and is resumed later,
presumably when the condition predicate is true and the thread is notified.
#include <threads.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
extern bool until_finish(void);
extern mtx_t lock;
extern cnd_t condition;
void func(void) {
if (thrd_success != mtx_lock(&lock)) {
/* Handle error */
}
while (until_finish()) { /* Predicate does not hold */
if (thrd_success != cnd_wait(&condition, &lock)) {
/* Handle error */
}
}
/* Resume when condition holds */
if (thrd_success != mtx_unlock(&lock)) {
/* Handle error */
}
}
The notification mechanism notifies the waiting thread and allows it to check
its condition predicate. The invocation of
cnd_broadcast() in another thread cannot precisely determine
which waiting thread will be resumed. Condition predicate statements allow
notified threads to determine whether they should resume upon receiving the
notification.
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example monitors a linked list and assigns one thread to consume list elements when the list is nonempty.
This thread pauses execution using
cnd_wait() and resumes when notified, presumably when the list has
elements to be consumed. It is possible for the thread to be notified even if
the list is still empty, perhaps because the notifying thread used
cnd_broadcast(), which notifies all threads. Notification using
cnd_broadcast() is frequently preferred over using
cnd_signal(). (See
CON38-C.
Preserve thread safety and liveness when using condition variables for more
information.)
A condition predicate is typically the negation of the condition
expression in the loop. In this noncompliant code example, the condition
predicate for removing an element from a linked list is
(list->next != NULL), whereas the condition expression for the
while loop condition is
(list->next == NULL).
This noncompliant code example nests the
cnd_wait() function inside an
if block and consequently fails to check the condition predicate
after the notification is received. If the notification was spurious or
malicious, the thread would wake up prematurely.
#include <stddef.h>
#include <threads.h>
struct node_t {
void *node;
struct node_t *next;
};
struct node_t list;
static mtx_t lock;
static cnd_t condition;
void consume_list_element(void) {
if (thrd_success != mtx_lock(&lock)) {
/* Handle error */
}
if (list.next == NULL) {
if (thrd_success != cnd_wait(&condition, &lock)) {
/* Handle error */
}
}
/* Proceed when condition holds */
if (thrd_success != mtx_unlock(&lock)) {
/* Handle error */
}
}
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution calls the
cnd_wait() function from within a
while loop to check the condition both before and after the
call to
cnd_wait():
#include <stddef.h>
#include <threads.h>
struct node_t {
void *node;
struct node_t *next;
};
struct node_t list;
static mtx_t lock;
static cnd_t condition;
void consume_list_element(void) {
if (thrd_success != mtx_lock(&lock)) {
/* Handle error */
}
while (list.next == NULL) {
if (thrd_success != cnd_wait(&condition, &lock)) {
/* Handle error */
}
}
/* Proceed when condition holds */
if (thrd_success != mtx_unlock(&lock)) {
/* Handle error */
}
}
Risk Assessment
Failure to enclose calls to the
cnd_wait() or
cnd_timedwait() functions inside a
while loop can lead to indefinite blocking and
denial
of service (DoS).
| Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON36-C | Low | Unlikely | Medium | P2 | L3 |
Related Guidelines
| Taxonomy | Taxonomy item | Relationship |
|---|---|---|
| CERT Oracle Secure Coding Standard for Java | THI03-J. Always invoke wait() and await() methods inside a loop | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
Bibliography
| [ ISO/IEC 9899:2011] | 7.17.7.4, "The
atomic_compare_exchange Generic Functions"
|
| [ Lea 2000] | 1.3.2, "Liveness" 3.2.2, "Monitor Mechanics" |
Possible Messages
Key |
Text |
Severity |
Disabled |
|---|---|---|---|
call_outside_loop |
Wrap functions that can spuriously wake up in a loop. |
None |
False |
Options¶
This rule shares the following common options: exclude_in_macros, exclude_messages_in_system_headers, excludes, extend_exclude_to_macro_invocations, includes, justification_checker, languages, post_processing, provider, report_at, severity
The following places define options that affect this rule: Stylechecks, Analysis-GlobalOptions
spuriously_waking_up_routines¶
spuriously_waking_up_routines : set[bauhaus.analysis.config.QualifiedName] = {'cnd_timedwait', 'cnd_wait'}