CertC-DCL05ΒΆ

Use typedefs of non-pointer types only

Required inputs: IR

Using type definitions ( typedef) can often improve code readability. However, type definitions to pointer types can make it more difficult to write const-correct code because the const qualifier will be applied to the pointer type, not to the underlying declared type.

Noncompliant Code Example

The following type definition improves readability at the expense of introducing a const-correctness issue. In this example, the const qualifier applies to the typedef instead of to the underlying object type. Consequently, func does not take a pointer to a const struct obj but instead takes a const pointer to a struct obj. 

struct obj {
  int i;
  float f;
};
typedef struct obj *ObjectPtr;
 
void func(const ObjectPtr o) {
  /* Can actually modify o's contents, against expectations */
}
Compliant Solution

This compliant solution makes use of type definitions but does not declare a pointer type and so cannot be used in a const-incorrect manner: 

struct obj {
  int i;
  float f;
};
typedef struct obj Object;

void func(const Object *o) {
  /* Cannot modify o's contents */
}
Noncompliant Code Example (Windows)

The Win32 SDK headers make use of type definitions for most of the types involved in Win32 APIs, but this noncompliant code example demonstrates a const-correctness bug: 

#include <Windows.h>
/* typedef char *LPSTR; */
 
void func(const LPSTR str) {
  /* Can mutate str's contents, against expectations */
}
Compliant Solution (Windows)

This compliant solution demonstrates a common naming convention found in the Win32 APIs, using the proper const type: 

#include <Windows.h>
/* typedef const char *LPCSTR; */
 
void func(LPCSTR str) {
  /* Cannot modify str's contents */
}
Noncompliant Code Example (Windows) 

Note that many structures in the Win32 API are declared with pointer type definitions but not pointer-to- const type definitions ( LPPOINT, LPSIZE, and others). In these cases, it is suggested that you create your own type definition from the base structure type. 

#include <Windows.h>
/*
  typedef struct tagPOINT {
    long x, y;
  } POINT, *LPPOINT;
*/
 
void func(const LPPOINT pt) {
  /* Can modify pt's contents, against expectations */
}
Compliant Solution (Windows)
#include <Windows.h>
/*
  typedef struct tagPOINT {
    long x, y;
  } POINT, *LPPOINT;
*/
 
typedef const POINT *LPCPOINT;
void func(LPCPOINT pt) {
  /* Cannot modify pt's contents */
}
Noncompliant Code Example

In this noncompliant code example, the declaration of the signal() function is difficult to read and comprehend: 

void (*signal(int, void (*)(int)))(int);
Compliant Solution

This compliant solution makes use of type definitions to specify the same type as in the noncompliant code example:

typedef void SighandlerType(int signum);
extern SighandlerType *signal(
  int signum,
  SighandlerType *handler
);
Exceptions

Function pointer types are an exception to this recommendation. 

Risk Assessment

Code readability is important for discovering and eliminating vulnerabilities.

Recommendation Severity Likelihood Remediation Cost Priority Level
DCL05-C Low Unlikely Medium P2 L3
Related Guidelines
SEI CERT C Coding Standard DCL12-C. Implement abstract data types using opaque types
SEI CERT C++ Coding Standard VOID DCL05-CPP. Use typedefs to improve code readability
Excerpt from SEI CERT C Coding Standard: Rules for Developing Safe, Reliable, and Secure Systems (2016 Edition) and SEI CERT C Coding Standard [https://cmu-sei.github.io/secure-coding-standards/sei-cert-c-coding-standard/recommendations/declarations-and-initialization-dcl/dcl05-c], Copyright (C) 1995-2026 Carnegie Mellon University. See section 9.4. "3rd-Party Licenses" in the documentation for full details.

Possible Messages

Key

Text

Severity

Disabled

function_pointer_missing_typedef

Use typedefs for function pointers to improve readability

None

False

pointer_typedef

Typedef for non-const pointer should not be used

None

False

Options