CWE-457¶
Use of Uninitialized Variable. [Improper-Control-Of-A-Resource-Through-Its-Lifetime]
Required inputs: IR
Demonstrative Examples
Example 1
This code prints a greeting using information stored in a POST request:
Example Language:PHP (Unsupported language for documentation only)
if (isset($_POST['names'])) {
$nameArray = $_POST['names'];
}
echo "Hello " . $nameArray['first'];
This code checks if the POST array 'names' is set before assigning it to the $nameArray variable. However, if the array is not in the POST request, $nameArray will remain uninitialized. This will cause an error when the array is accessed to print the greeting message, which could lead to further exploit.
Example 2
The following switch statement is intended to set the values of the variables aN and bN before they are used:
Example Language:C
int aN, Bn;
switch (ctl) {
case -1:
aN = 0;
bN = 0;
break;
case 0:
aN = i;
bN = -i;
break;
case 1:
aN = i + NEXT_SZ;
bN = i - NEXT_SZ;
break;
default:
aN = -1;
aN = -1;
break;
}
repaint(aN, bN);
In the default case of the switch statement, the programmer has accidentally set the value of aN twice. As a result, bN will have an undefined value. Most uninitialized variable issues result in general software reliability problems, but if attackers can intentionally trigger the use of an uninitialized variable, they might be able to launch a denial of service attack by crashing the program. Under the right circumstances, an attacker may be able to control the value of an uninitialized variable by affecting the values on the stack prior to the invocation of the function.
Example 3
This example will leave test_string in an unknown condition when i is the same value as err_val, because test_string is not initialized (CWE-456). Depending on where this code segment appears (e.g. within a function body), test_string might be random if it is stored on the heap or stack. If the variable is declared in static memory, it might be zero or NULL. Compiler optimization might contribute to the unpredictability of this address.
Example Language:Cchar *test_string;
if (i != err_val)
{
test_string = "Hello World!";
}
printf("%s", test_string);
When the printf() is reached, test_string might be an unexpected address, so the printf might print junk strings (CWE-457).
To fix this code, there are a couple approaches to making sure that test_string has been properly set once it reaches the printf().
One solution would be to set test_string to an acceptable default before the conditional:
Example Language:Cchar *test_string = "Done at the beginning";
if (i != err_val)
{
test_string = "Hello World!";
}
printf("%s", test_string);
Another solution is to ensure that each branch of the conditional - including the default/else branch - could ensure that test_string is set:
Example Language:Cchar *test_string;
if (i != err_val)
{
test_string = "Hello World!";
}
else {
test_string = "Done on the other side!";
}
printf("%s", test_string);Excerpts from CWE [https://cwe.mitre.org], Copyright (C) 2006-2026, the MITRE Corporation. See section 9.4. "3rd-Party Licenses" in the documentation for full details.Possible Messages
Key |
Text |
Severity |
Disabled |
|---|---|---|---|
assigned_to_pointer_to_const |
Assigning the address of a partially initialized variable to some pointer-to-const |
None |
False |
pass_as_pointer_to_const_param |
Passing uninitialized variable by pointer as function parameter with pointer-to-const type |
None |
False |
possible_return_value_uninit |
Function return value is potentially not initialized |
None |
False |
possible_uninit |
Use of possibly uninitialized variable |
None |
False |
possibly_initialized |
Use of possibly uninitialized variable (previous call {node0} might have initialized the variable) |
None |
False |
return_value_uninit |
Function return value is not initialized |
None |
False |
uninit |
Use of uninitialized variable |
None |
False |
Options¶
This rule shares the following common options: exclude_in_macros, exclude_messages_in_system_headers, excludes, extend_exclude_to_macro_invocations, includes, justification_checker, languages, post_processing, provider, report_at, severity
The following places define options that affect this rule: Stylechecks, Analysis-GlobalOptions
additional_local_array_check¶
additional_local_array_check : bool = True
int example()
{
int a[10];
int b[20];
int uninit_var;
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
{
L1: a[i] = uninit_var; // use of uninit_var reported
b[i] = i;
}
int result = a[3]; // not reported, since already reported at L1
result += b[15]; // reported; c[] is not (completely) initialized
return result;
}
assume_globals_are_initialized¶
assume_globals_are_initialized : bool = True
check_array_access_with_unknown_index¶
check_array_access_with_unknown_index : bool = False
a[i] with non-literal index
i should be checked as well.
exclude_from_pointer_to_const_param_check¶
exclude_from_pointer_to_const_param_check : set[bauhaus.analysis.config.QualifiedName] = {'__builtin_object_size'}
track_conditional_initialization¶
track_conditional_initialization : bool = True
use_semantic_analysis¶
use_semantic_analysis : bool = True
writing_into_pointer_to_const¶
writing_into_pointer_to_const
Names of routines (mapping to parameter index, starting at 0) having a parameter declared as pointer-to-const yet they are still writing into the pointee.Type: dict[bauhaus.analysis.config.QualifiedName, int]
Default:
{ 'cudaMemcpyToSymbol': 0 }