How good is Squish's support for custom Qt classes?
Quite often, the subclassing of Qt classes is done to change the look and behavior of standard widgets. Or to store some extra internal information. Squish will recognize those classes at least up to the level it would support the underlying standard classes. So if an application's developers subclass e.g.
QPushButton to create a round button or to make the button change shape if pressed, this will no pose a problem as Squish's emulation is purely concerned with user input in terms of keyboard and mouse input independent of the behavior of the underlying C++ functions that are called.
In many test scenarios test engineers are only concerned with standard visible properties, like
color, and these work out of the box for custom
QObject subclasses that inherit such properties. In addition, custom
QObject subclasses' properties and slots (marked via the
slots macros) are automatically detected. This means that their properties will show up in the Spy and their custom slots (provided the signatures use standard Qt types) are callable.
So in almost all cases Squish's automatic detection is sufficient.
© 2023 The Qt Company Ltd.
Documentation contributions included herein are the copyrights of
their respective owners.
The documentation provided herein is licensed under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License version 1.3 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
Qt and respective logos are trademarks of The Qt Company Ltd. in Finland and/or other countries worldwide. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.